For more than two years, I have been worrying aloud about the lack of training for nonprofit professionals who want to lead their organizations in implementing outcomes management and data visualization. Today I’m rejoicing, because Tech Networks of Boston opened registration for a free (and sales-pitch-free) half-day outcomes management training for nonprofit executives.
It’s happening in April because some wonderful allies have stepped up – such as TNB’s co-hosts, the Mel King Institute and the College of Public and Community Service at the University of Massachusetts, and the wonderful Kathryn Engelhardt-Cronk of Community TechKnowledge, who will serve as our trainer.
This isn’t the full series of three day-long trainings on outcomes management and outcomes data visualization that I had originally envisioned, and that I still hope we can organize. If we are able to do that, the other trainers will be the equally wonderful Beth Kanter and Georges Grinstein. Right now, I’m looking at plans for Kathryn’s half-day outcomes management training as a miracle in itself, but also as the thin edge of the wedge. (If you prefer more up to date jargon, you can call it a “proof of concept.”)
Of course, my thinking has become even more grandiose since I originally came up with the idea of a three-day outcomes/data viz training series. Now I’m thinking in terms of a “Massachusetts Institute of Nonprofit Technology,” in which the first initiative would be a degree program in nonprofit data analysis.
Let’s take this training opportunity, which will be brief in comparison to the more elaborate programs that I’ve envisioned, and build on it!
First of all, a personal resolution: I will not whine.
The Boston Indicators Project, which is an initiative by the Boston Foundation and the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, relaunched its web site in November, and I was not invited to the event. I will subdue my inclination to pout, and move on to praising the new web site.
Fortunately, a fellow Boston Technobabe, Kat Friedrich, did attend; you therefore have the option of skipping my blog article and going straight to hers. Kat’s focus is on “How Nonprofits Can Earn News Coverage Using Data Visualization,” which is certainly a great take-away for mission-based organizations.
My interest is slightly different. Here are a few things that are especially striking:
- Measuring what we value. This principle is prominently displayed on the relaunched web site, and is one that I learned in 2002 from the Boston Indicators Project’s co-founder and director, Charlotte Kahn. (I worked on the 2003 indicators report, which was the very first to be webified.) The version I heard from her own lips is “we should measure what we value, rather than only valuing what we can measure.” It’s not enough to throw together a lot of data about our region, simply because it’s available. We have to think about what it means, why it’s important, and it helps us understand the most effective strategies for positive change.
- Democratizing the data. This is a principle that I learned both from Charlotte and from Barry Bluestone; the latter is a professor at Northeastern University and has been enormously influential in the evolving Boston Indicators Project. Democratizing the data means more than making canned reports available; it entails a constant effort to increase the interactivity of the web site, so that anyone concerned about the future of our region can slice and dice crucial data, and thereby go beyond the Boston Indicators Report to conclusions and initiatives of his or her own. For that, we must thank not only Charlotte and Barry, but two of my other great favorites: Tim Gassert, the Boston Foundation’s director of web communications, and Georges Grinstein, a professor of computer science at University of Massachusetts at Lowell and one of the trailblazers in the creation of the Weave data visualization tool.
The new Boston Indicators web site is great example of nonprofit technology in the service of a mission that is much greater any one community foundation or specific region. I happen to live in the greater Boston area, so I’ve been more easily drawn to it than I would be if I were living elsewhere. But it’s an example to any individual or organization, of the power of the universal access to the significant data, and the importance of analyzing it in ways that benefit the community.